American Jews have much to be proud of as we’ve pursued both of these goals, even in the face of ever present threats and ongoing challenges. American Jews and American Jewish communities have thrived in this country. We have, simultaneously, strengthened the civic fabric of America by participating actively in the democratic process, taking up roles in civil and military service, championing the causes of our fellow citizens, and supporting our country and communities through generous philanthropy.
For American Jews to continue to contribute to the American story, we must, like generations before us, interpret and respond to the challenges of the moment. In our day, some of the most urgent of these challenges include toxic political polarization, decreasing commitment to liberal democracy, eroding faith in communal and societal institutions, and declines in civic participation across America, including in Jewish communities.
As American Jews do our part to join and strengthen a larger civic renewal movement, we draw on the following five principles. By cultivating – and acting out of – the civic virtues outlined in these principles, American Jews can play our part in strengthening the future of American Judaism and the future of the United States of America.
Discussion Questions:
- Rabbi Soloveitchik says we are “very much residents... and at the same time strangers.” How do you experience this duality in your own life?
- In what ways are American Jews insiders in civic life? In what ways are we still outsiders?
- How can the concept of ger v’toshav help us approach contemporary civic challenges, such as polarization or declining engagement?
- How does understanding ourselves as “resident strangers with God” inspire action — politically, ethically, or communally?
- How might embracing the identity of ger v’toshav push us to build coalitions with others who are marginalized, displaced, or excluded?
- What can this particular framing of Jewish identity teach us about how to be Jewish participants in the American story — not just for ourselves, but for the good of the whole?
(ג) וַיָּ֙קׇם֙ אַבְרָהָ֔ם מֵעַ֖ל פְּנֵ֣י מֵת֑וֹ וַיְדַבֵּ֥ר אֶל־בְּנֵי־חֵ֖ת לֵאמֹֽר׃ (ד) גֵּר־וְתוֹשָׁ֥ב אָנֹכִ֖י עִמָּכֶ֑ם תְּנ֨וּ לִ֤י אֲחֻזַּת־קֶ֙בֶר֙ עִמָּכֶ֔ם וְאֶקְבְּרָ֥ה מֵתִ֖י מִלְּפָנָֽי׃
(3) Then Abraham rose from beside his dead, and spoke to the Hittites, saying, (4) “I am a resident alien among you; sell me a burial site among you, that I may remove my dead for burial.”
- What does it mean for Avraham to describe himself as both a "stranger" and a "resident"? Can one be both at the same time?
- How might this dual identity mirror the American Jewish experience?
- What kinds of rights, responsibilities, and limitations might come with each status — stranger and resident?
(כג) וְהָאָ֗רֶץ לֹ֤א תִמָּכֵר֙ לִצְמִתֻ֔ת כִּי־לִ֖י הָאָ֑רֶץ כִּֽי־גֵרִ֧ים וְתוֹשָׁבִ֛ים אַתֶּ֖ם עִמָּדִֽי׃
(23) But the land must not be sold beyond reclaim, for the land is Mine; you are but strangers resident with Me.
(לה) וְכִֽי־יָמ֣וּךְ אָחִ֔יךָ וּמָ֥טָה יָד֖וֹ עִמָּ֑ךְ וְהֶֽחֱזַ֣קְתָּ בּ֔וֹ גֵּ֧ר וְתוֹשָׁ֛ב וָחַ֖י עִמָּֽךְ׃
(35) If your kin, being in straits, come under your authority, and are held by you as though resident aliens, let them live by your side:
- What do these verses suggest about who truly “owns” the land? How might that reframe our sense of belonging and responsibility?
- How do these verses link the identity of ger v’toshav with moral obligations toward others (like the impoverished)?
- In what ways might being “resident aliens with God” shape how we engage with American society?
(טו) כִּֽי־גֵרִ֨ים אֲנַ֧חְנוּ לְפָנֶ֛יךָ וְתוֹשָׁבִ֖ים כְּכׇל־אֲבֹתֵ֑ינוּ כַּצֵּ֧ל ׀ יָמֵ֛ינוּ עַל־הָאָ֖רֶץ וְאֵ֥ין מִקְוֶֽה׃
(15) For we are sojourners with You, mere transients like our fathers; our days on earth are like a shadow, with nothing in prospect.
(יג) שִׁ֥מְעָֽה־תְפִלָּתִ֨י ׀ יהוה וְשַׁוְעָתִ֨י ׀ הַאֲזִינָה֮ אֶֽל־דִּמְעָתִ֗י אַֽל־תֶּ֫חֱרַ֥שׁ כִּ֤י גֵ֣ר אָנֹכִ֣י עִמָּ֑ךְ תּ֝וֹשָׁ֗ב כְּכׇל־אֲבוֹתָֽי׃
(13) Hear my prayer, O LORD; give ear to my cry; do not disregard my tears; for like all my forebears I am an alien, resident with You.
- How do these texts evoke a sense of humility, impermanence, or spiritual exile?
- How does the awareness of transience influence Jewish responsibility — to tradition, to others, to society?
- Can this self-understanding help foster empathy or solidarity with others who feel like outsiders in America today?
מַאי ״עוֹבְדָהּ״, וּמַאי ״שֶׁאֵינוֹ עוֹבְדָהּ״? אִילֵּימָא אִידֵּי וְאִידֵּי גּוֹי, הַיְינוּ שֶׁלּוֹ וְשֶׁל חֲבֵירוֹ! אֶלָּא לָאו ״עוֹבְדָהּ״ — גּוֹי, וּמַאי ״שֶׁאֵינוֹ עוֹבְדָהּ״ — גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב, וּשְׁמַע מִינַּהּ גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב נָמֵי מְבַטֵּל! לָא, לְעוֹלָם אֵימָא לָךְ: אִידֵּי וְאִידֵּי גּוֹי, וּדְקָאָמְרַתְּ הַיְינוּ ״שֶׁלּוֹ וְשֶׁל חֲבֵירוֹ״: רֵישָׁא — זֶה וָזֶה לִפְעוֹר, וְזֶה וָזֶה לְמַרְקוּלִיס; סֵיפָא — זֶה לִפְעוֹר וְזֶה לְמַרְקוּלִיס. מֵיתִיבִי: אֵיזֶהוּ גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב? כֹּל שֶׁקִּיבֵּל עָלָיו בִּפְנֵי שְׁלֹשָׁה חֲבֵרִים שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲבוֹד עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי מֵאִיר. וַחֲכָמִים אוֹמְרִים: כֹּל שֶׁקִּיבֵּל עָלָיו שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת שֶׁקִּבְּלוּ עֲלֵיהֶם בְּנֵי נֹחַ.
What is meant by the phrase: Worships it, and what is meant by the phrase: Does not worship it? If we say both this and that are referring to a gentile, this is the same as the previous statement in the baraita, that a gentile can revoke the status of his own object of idol worship or that of another gentile, i.e., an object that he worships or one that another gentile worships. Rather, isn’t it to be understood that the phrase: Worships it, is referring to a gentile? And what is the meaning of the phrase: Does not worship it? It is referring to a ger toshav, who does not worship any idols. And learn from it that a ger toshav can also revoke the status of objects of idol worship. The Gemara rejects this explanation. No, actually, I will say to you that this phrase and that phrase are both referring to a gentile, and with regard to that which you say, that this is the same as the statement concerning his object of idol worship or that of another gentile, it can be explained as follows: The first clause is referring to a case where both gentiles worship the same idol, e.g., this one and that one both worship Peor, or this one and that one both worship Mercury, and the baraita is teaching that one can revoke the status of an idol that belongs to the other. The latter clause, which distinguishes between one who worships it and one who does not worship it, is referring to a case where this one worships Peor and that one worships Mercury, indicating that an idolater can revoke the status of an idol that he does not worship at all, but only if he is himself an idolater, as opposed to a ger toshav. The Gemara raises an objection from a baraita: Who is a ger toshav? It is anyone who has accepted upon himself before three ḥaverim, i.e., people devoted to the meticulous observance of mitzvot, especially halakhot of ritual purity, teruma, and tithes, not to worship idols. This is the statement of Rabbi Meir. And the Rabbis say: Anyone who has accepted upon himself observance of the seven mitzvot that the descendants of Noah accepted upon themselves is a ger toshav.
(ו) אֵין כָּל הַדְּבָרִים הָאֵלּוּ אֲמוּרִים אֶלָּא בִּזְמַן שֶׁגָּלוּ יִשְׂרָאֵל לְבֵין הָעוֹבְדֵי כּוֹכָבִים אוֹ שֶׁיַּד עַכּוּ"ם תַּקִּיפָה עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל אֲבָל בִּזְמַן שֶׁיַּד יִשְׂרָאֵל תַּקִּיפָה עֲלֵיהֶם אָסוּר לָנוּ לְהַנִּיחַ עוֹבְדֵי כּוֹכָבִים בֵּינֵינוּ. וַאֲפִלּוּ יוֹשֵׁב יְשִׁיבַת עַרְאַי אוֹ עוֹבֵר מִמָּקוֹם לְמָקוֹם בִּסְחוֹרָה לֹא יַעֲבֹר בְּאַרְצֵנוּ אֶלָּא עַד שֶׁיְּקַבֵּל עָלָיו שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת שֶׁנִּצְטַוּוּ בְּנֵי נֹחַ שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמות כג לג) "לֹא יֵשְׁבוּ בְּאַרְצְךָ" אֲפִלּוּ לְפִי שָׁעָה. וְאִם קִבֵּל עָלָיו שֶׁבַע מִצְוֹת הֲרֵי זֶה גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב. וְאֵין מְקַבְּלִין גֵּר תּוֹשָׁב אֶלָּא בִּזְמַן שֶׁהַיּוֹבֵל נוֹהֵג אֲבָל שֶׁלֹּא בִּזְמַן הַיּוֹבֵל אֵין מְקַבְּלִין אֶלָּא גֵּר צֶדֶק בִּלְבַד:
(6) All the above matters apply only in an era when Israel is in exile among the idolaters or in an era when the idolaters are in power. When, however, Israel is in power over them, it is forbidden for us to allow an idolater among us. Even a temporary resident or a merchant who travels from place to place should not be allowed to pass through our land until he accepts the seven universal laws commanded to Noah and his descendants, as [Exodus 23:33] states: "They shall not dwell in your land" - i.e., even temporarily. A person who accepts these seven mitzvot is a ger toshav. A ger toshav may be accepted only in the era when the [laws of the] Jubilee Year are observed. In an era when the [laws of the] Jubilee Year are not observed, however, we may accept only full converts [to Judaism].
- What does this text tell us about Jewish authority and inclusion when Jews are in power?
- How might these halakhic ideas contrast with, or inform, the values of religious freedom and equal rights in a democratic society?
- In America, Jews are not in control of the land — how does this change the application or relevance of this teaching?