תורה
יכוין בקריאת חמשה פסוקים אלו שהם כנגד הִ דמילוי הה אחרונה דשם ב''ן לקנות הארת רוח יתרה משבת הבאה:
א (כב) וַיְצַ֣ו פַּרְעֹ֔ה לְכׇל־עַמּ֖וֹ לֵאמֹ֑ר כׇּל־הַבֵּ֣ן הַיִּלּ֗וֹד הַיְאֹ֙רָה֙ תַּשְׁלִיכֻ֔הוּ וְכׇל־הַבַּ֖ת תְּחַיּֽוּן׃ {פ}
וּפַקִיד פַּרְעֹה לְכָל עַמֵהּ לְמֵימָר כָּל בְּרָא דְיִתְיְלִיד לִיהוּדָאֵי בְּנַהֲרָא תִּרְמֻנֵהּ וְכָל בְּרַתָּא תְּקַיְמוּן:
ב (א) וַיֵּ֥לֶךְ אִ֖ישׁ מִבֵּ֣ית לֵוִ֑י וַיִּקַּ֖ח אֶת־בַּת־לֵוִֽי׃
וַאֲזַל גַבְרָא מִדְבֵית לֵוִי וּנְסִיב יָת בַּת לֵוִי:
(ב) וַתַּ֥הַר הָאִשָּׁ֖ה וַתֵּ֣לֶד בֵּ֑ן וַתֵּ֤רֶא אֹתוֹ֙ כִּי־ט֣וֹב ה֔וּא וַֽתִּצְפְּנֵ֖הוּ שְׁלֹשָׁ֥ה יְרָחִֽים׃
וְעַדִיאַת אִתְּתָא וִילִידַת בָּר וַחֲזַת יָתֵהּ אֲרֵי טַב הוּא וְאַטְמַרְתֵּהּ תְּלָתָא יַרְחִין:
(ג) וְלֹא־יָכְלָ֣ה עוֹד֮ הַצְּפִינוֹ֒ וַתִּֽקַּֽח־לוֹ֙ תֵּ֣בַת גֹּ֔מֶא וַתַּחְמְרָ֥הֿ בַחֵמָ֖ר וּבַזָּ֑פֶת וַתָּ֤שֶׂם בָּהּ֙ אֶת־הַיֶּ֔לֶד וַתָּ֥שֶׂם בַּסּ֖וּף עַל־שְׂפַ֥ת הַיְאֹֽר׃
וְלָא יְכֵילַת עוֹד לְאַטְמָרוּתֵהּ וּנְסֵיבַת לֵהּ תֵּבוּתָא דְגוֹמֶא וְחַפָּתַהּ בְּחֵמָרָא וּבְזִפְתָּא וְשַׁוִיאַת בַּהּ יָת רַבְיָא וְשַׁוִיתַהּ בְּיַעֲרָא עַל כֵּיף נַהֲרָא:
(ד) וַתֵּתַצַּ֥ב אֲחֹת֖וֹ מֵרָחֹ֑ק לְדֵעָ֕ה מַה־יֵּעָשֶׂ֖ה לֽוֹ׃
וְאִתְעַתָּדַת אֲחָתֵהּ מֵרָחִיק לְמִידַע מָה יִתְעֲבֵד לֵהּ:
1 (22) And Par῾o charged all his people, saying, Every son that is born you shall cast into the River, and every daughter you shall save alive.
2 (1) And there went a man of the house of Levi, and took to wife a daughter of Levi.
(2) And the woman conceived, and bore a son: and when she saw that he was a goodly child, she hid him three months.
(3) And when she could not longer hide him, she took for him a box made of papyrus, and daubed it with slime and with pitch, and put the child in it; and she laid it in the rushes by the River’s brink.
(4) And his sister stood afar off, to know what would be done to him.
נביאים
כח (יד) לָכֵ֛ן שִׁמְע֥וּ דְבַר־יְהֹוָ֖ה אַנְשֵׁ֣י לָצ֑וֹן מֹֽשְׁלֵי֙ הָעָ֣ם הַזֶּ֔ה אֲשֶׁ֖ר בִּירוּשָׁלָֽ͏ִם׃
בְּכֵן קַבִּילוּ פִּתְגָמָא דַייָ גַבְרִין רַשִׁיעִין שִׁלְטוֹנֵי עַמָא הָדֵין דִי בִירוּשְׁלֵם:
(טו) כִּ֣י אֲמַרְתֶּ֗ם כָּרַ֤תְנֽוּ בְרִית֙ אֶת־מָ֔וֶת וְעִם־שְׁא֖וֹל עָשִׂ֣ינוּ חֹזֶ֑ה (שיט) [שׁ֣וֹט] שׁוֹטֵ֤ף כִּי־[יַֽעֲבֹר֙] (עבר) לֹ֣א יְבוֹאֵ֔נוּ כִּ֣י שַׂ֧מְנוּ כָזָ֛ב מַחְסֵ֖נוּ וּבַשֶּׁ֥קֶר נִסְתָּֽרְנוּ׃ {פ}
אֲרֵי אֲמַרְתּוּן גְזַרְנָא קְיָם עִם קְטוֹלָא וְעִם מַחְבְּלָא עֲבַדְנָא שְׁלָמָא מְחַת סַנְאָה אֲרֵי תֵיתֵי עֲלֵיכוֹן כְּנַחַל מַגְבַּר דְאַתּוּן אָמְרִין לָא תֵיתֵי עֲלָנָא אֲרֵי שַׁוֵינָא בִּכְדִיב רָחֲצָנָנָא וּבְגִין שִׁקְרִין אִטַמַרְנָא:
(טז) לָכֵ֗ן כֹּ֤ה אָמַר֙ אֲדֹנָ֣י יֱהֹוִ֔ה הִנְנִ֛י יִסַּ֥ד בְּצִיּ֖וֹן אָ֑בֶן אֶ֣בֶן בֹּ֜חַן פִּנַּ֤ת יִקְרַת֙ מוּסָ֣ד מוּסָּ֔ד הַֽמַּאֲמִ֖ין לֹ֥א יָחִֽישׁ׃
בְּכֵן כִּדְנַן אֲמַר יְיָ אֱלֹהִים הָא אֲנָא מְמַנֵי בְצִיוֹן מֶלֶךְ מֶלֶךְ תַּקִיף גִיבַּר וְאֵימְתָן אַתְקְפִינֵהּ וְאַחְסְנִינֵהּ אֲמַר נְבִיָא וְצַדִיקַיָא דְהֵימָנוּ בְאִלֵין בְּמֵיתֵי עָקָא לָא יִזְדַעְזְעוּן:
(יז) וְשַׂמְתִּ֤י מִשְׁפָּט֙ לְקָ֔ו וּצְדָקָ֖ה לְמִשְׁקָ֑לֶת וְיָעָ֤ה בָרָד֙ מַחְסֵ֣ה כָזָ֔ב וְסֵ֥תֶר מַ֖יִם יִשְׁטֹֽפוּ׃ {ס}
וֶאֱשַׁוֵי דִנָא תַקִין דְאִטַמַרְתּוּן כְּחוּט בִּנְיָנָא וּזְכוּתָא כְּאֶבֶן מַשְׁקוּלְתָּא וְיִדְלַק רוּגְזִי בְּרוֹחֲצָן כִּדְבֵיכוֹן וְעַל דְאִטַמַרְתּוּן מִן קֳדָם מְעִיקָא יַתְכוֹן עַמְמַיָא יִגְלוֹן:
(יח) וְכֻפַּ֤ר בְּרִֽיתְכֶם֙ אֶת־מָ֔וֶת וְחָזוּתְכֶ֥ם אֶת־שְׁא֖וֹל לֹ֣א תָק֑וּם שׁ֤וֹט שׁוֹטֵף֙ כִּ֣י יַֽעֲבֹ֔ר וִהְיִ֥יתֶם ל֖וֹ לְמִרְמָֽס׃
וִיבַטֵל קִיָמְכוֹן דְעִם קָטוֹלָא וּשְׁלָמְכוֹן דְעִם מְחַבְּלָא לָא יִתְקַיָם מְחַת סָנְאָה אֲרֵי תֵיתֵי עֲלֵיכוֹן כְּנַחַל מַגְבַּר וּתְחוֹן לְהוֹן לְדָיִשׁ:
28 (14) Wherefore hear the word of the Lord, scornful men, that rule this people which is in Yerushalayim.
(15) Because you have said, We have made a covenant with death, and with She᾽ol are we at agreement; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, it shall not come to us: for we have made lies our refuge, and under falsehood have we hid ourselves:
(16) therefore thus says the Lord God, Behold, I lay in Żiyyon for a foundation a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone, a sure foundation: he that believes shall not make haste.
(17) Judgment also will I lay by a line, and righteousness by a plummet: and the hail shall sweep away the refuge of lies, and waters shall overflow the hiding place.
(18) And your covenant with death shall be annulled, and your agreement with She᾽ol shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then you shall be trodden down by it.
כתובים
יב (טו) דֶּ֣רֶךְ אֱ֭וִיל יָשָׁ֣ר בְּעֵינָ֑יו וְשֹׁמֵ֖עַ לְעֵצָ֣ה חָכָֽם׃
אָרְחֵיהּ דְסַכְלָא תְרִיצָא בְּאַפּוֹי וּדְשָׁמֵעַ לְעֵיצְתָא חַכִּימָא הוּא:
(טז) אֱוִ֗יל בַּ֭יּוֹם יִוָּדַ֣ע כַּעְס֑וֹ וְכֹסֶ֖ה קָל֣וֹן עָרֽוּם׃
שַׁטְיָא כַּד יוֹמֵיהּ מוֹדַע רוּגְזֵיהּ וַעֲרִים מְכַסֵי צַעֲרֵיהּ:
(יז) יָפִ֣יחַ אֱ֭מוּנָה יַגִּ֣יד צֶ֑דֶק וְעֵ֖ד שְׁקָרִ֣ים מִרְמָֽה׃
מַן דְמַסְהֵיד הֵימָנוּתָא נִתְנֵי צַדִיקוּתָא וְסָהֵד דְשִׁקְרָא רַמָאָה הוּא:
(יח) יֵ֣שׁ בּ֭וֹטֶה כְּמַדְקְר֣וֹת חָ֑רֶב וּלְשׁ֖וֹן חֲכָמִ֣ים מַרְפֵּֽא׃
אִית דְאִמְרֵיהּ סַפְסֵירָא רָגְשָׁא וְלִישָׁנָא דְחַכִּימֵי מָאסְיָא:
(יט) שְֽׂפַת־אֱ֭מֶת תִּכּ֣וֹן לָעַ֑ד וְעַד־אַ֝רְגִּ֗יעָה לְשׁ֣וֹן שָֽׁקֶר׃
שִׂפְתָא דְקֻשְׁטָא תִתַּקֵן לַעֲלָם וְסַהֲדָא מִסְתַּרְהֵב כְּלִישְׁנָא דְשִׁקְרָא:
12 (15) The way of a fool is right in his own eyes: but he that hearkens unto counsel is wise.
(16) A fool’s wrath is presently known: but a prudent man conceals disgrace.
(17) He who utters truth gives just evidence: but a false witness utters deceit.
(18) There is one who speaks like the piercings of a sword: but the tongue of the wise is health.
(19) The lip of truth shall be established for ever: but a lying tongue is but for a moment.
משנה
א. הַשּׁוֹחֵט וְהַמַּעֲלֶה בַחוּץ, חַיָּב עַל הַשְּׁחִיטָה וְחַיָּב עַל הָעֲלִיָּה. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגְּלִילִי אוֹמֵר, שָׁחַט בִּפְנִים וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, חַיָּב. שָׁחַט בַּחוּץ וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, פָּטוּר, שֶׁלֹּא הֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ אֶלָּא דָבָר פָּסוּל. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, אַף הַשּׁוֹחֵט בִּפְנִים וּמַעֲלֶה בַחוּץ, כֵּיוָן שֶׁהוֹצִיאוֹ, פְּסָלוֹ:
ב. טָמֵא שֶׁאָכַל, בֵּין קֹדֶשׁ טָמֵא וּבֵין קֹדֶשׁ טָהוֹר, חַיָּב. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי הַגְּלִילִי אוֹמֵר, טָמֵא שֶׁאָכַל טָהוֹר, חַיָּב. וְטָמֵא שֶׁאָכַל טָמֵא, פָּטוּר, שֶׁלֹּא אָכַל אֶלָּא דָבָר טָמֵא. אָמְרוּ לוֹ, אַף טָמֵא שֶׁאָכַל טָהוֹר, כֵּיוָן שֶׁנָּגַע בּוֹ, טִמְּאָהוּ. וְטָהוֹר שֶׁאָכַל טָמֵא, פָּטוּר, שֶׁאֵינוֹ חַיָּב אֶלָּא עַל טֻמְאַת הַגּוּף:
ג. חֹמֶר בַּשְּׁחִיטָה מִבָּעֲלִיָּה, וּבָעֲלִיָּה מִבַּשְּׁחִיטָה. חֹמֶר בַּשְּׁחִיטָה, שֶׁהַשּׁוֹחֵט לְהֶדְיוֹט, חַיָּב, וְהַמַּעֲלֶה לְהֶדְיוֹט, פָּטוּר. חֹמֶר בָּעֲלִיָּה, שְׁנַיִם שֶׁאָחֲזוּ בְסַכִּין וְשָׁחֲטוּ, פְּטוּרִים. אָחֲזוּ בְאֵבָר וְהֶעֱלוּהוּ, חַיָּבִין. הֶעֱלָה, וְחָזַר וְהֶעֱלָה, וְחָזַר וְהֶעֱלָה, חַיָּב עַל כָּל עֲלִיָּה וַעֲלִיָּה, דִּבְרֵי רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן. רַבִּי יוֹסֵי אוֹמֵר, אֵינוֹ חַיָּב אֶלָּא אַחַת, וְאֵינוֹ חַיָּב עַד שֶׁיַּעֲלֶה לְרֹאשׁ הַמִּזְבֵּחַ. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר, אֲפִלּוּ הֶעֱלָה עַל הַסֶּלַע אוֹ עַל הָאֶבֶן, חַיָּב:
ד. אֶחָד קָדָשִׁים כְּשֵׁרִין וְאֶחָד קָדָשִׁים פְּסוּלִין שֶׁהָיָה פְסוּלָן בַּקֹּדֶשׁ, וְהִקְרִיבָן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. הַמַּעֲלֶה כַזַּיִת מִן הָעוֹלָה וּמִן הָאֵמוּרִין בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. הַקֹּמֶץ, וְהַלְּבוֹנָה, וְהַקְּטֹרֶת, וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֲנִים, וּמִנְחַת כֹּהֵן הַמָּשִׁיחַ, וּמִנְחַת נְסָכִין, שֶׁהִקְרִיב מֵאַחַד מֵהֶן כַּזַיִת בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר פּוֹטֵר, עַד שֶׁיַּקְרִיב אֶת כֻּלּוֹ. וְכֻלָּם שֶׁהִקְרִיבָן בִּפְנִים וְשִׁיֵּר בָּהֶן כַּזַּיִת וְהִקְרִיבָן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. וְכֻלָּם שֶׁחָסְרוּ כָל שֶׁהֵן, וְהִקְרִיבָן בַּחוּץ, פָּטוּר:
ה. הַמַּקְרִיב קָדָשִׁים וְאֵמוּרֵיהֶם בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. מִנְחָה שֶׁלֹּא נִקְמְצָה וְהִקְרִיבָהּ בַּחוּץ, פָּטוּר. קְמָצָהּ, וְחָזַר קֻמְצָהּ לְתוֹכָהּ, וְהִקְרִיבָהּ בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב:
ו. הַקֹּמֶץ וְהַלְּבוֹנָה, שֶׁהִקְרִיב אֶת אַחַד מֵהֶן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר פּוֹטֵר עַד שֶׁיַּקְרִיב אֶת הַשֵּׁנִי. אֶחָד בִּפְנִים וְאֶחָד בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. שְׁנֵי בְזִיכֵי לְבוֹנָה, שֶׁהִקְרִיב אֶת אַחַד מֵהֶן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר פּוֹטֵר, עַד שֶׁיַּקְרִיב אֶת הַשֵּׁנִי. אֶחָד בִּפְנִים וְאֶחָד בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. הַזּוֹרֵק מִקְצָת דָּמִים בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. רַבִּי אֶלְעָזָר אוֹמֵר, אַף הַמְנַסֵּךְ מֵי חָג בֶּחָג בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. רַבִּי נְחֶמְיָה אוֹמֵר, שְׁיָרֵי הַדָּם שֶׁהִקְרִיבָן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב:
ז. הַמּוֹלֵק אֶת הָעוֹף בִּפְנִים וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, חַיָּב. מָלַק בַּחוּץ וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, פָּטוּר. הַשּׁוֹחֵט אֶת הָעוֹף בִּפְנִים וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, פָּטוּר. שָׁחַט בַּחוּץ וְהֶעֱלָה בַחוּץ, חַיָּב. נִמְצָא, דֶּרֶךְ הֶכְשֵׁרוֹ מִבִּפְנִים, פְּטוּרוֹ בַחוּץ. דֶּרֶךְ הֶכְשֵׁרוֹ בַחוּץ, פְּטוּרוֹ בִפְנִים. רַבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן אוֹמֵר, כֹּל שֶׁחַיָּבִין עָלָיו בַחוּץ, חַיָּבִין עַל כַּיּוֹצֵא בוֹ בִפְנִים, שֶׁהֶעֱלָהוּ בַחוּץ, חוּץ מִן הַשּׁוֹחֵט בִּפְנִים וּמַעֲלֶה בַחוּץ:
ח. הַחַטָּאת שֶׁקִּבֵּל דָּמָהּ בְּכוֹס אֶחָד, נָתַן בַּחוּץ וְחָזַר וְנָתַן בִּפְנִים, בִּפְנִים וְחָזַר וְנָתַן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב, שֶׁכֻּלּוֹ רָאוּי לָבֹא בִפְנִים. קִבֵּל דָּמָהּ בִּשְׁנֵי כוֹסוֹת, נָתַן שְׁנֵיהֶם בִּפְנִים, פָּטוּר. שְׁנֵיהֶן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. אֶחָד בִּפְנִים וְאֶחָד בַּחוּץ, פָּטוּר. אֶחָד בַּחוּץ וְאֶחָד בִּפְנִים, חַיָּב עַל הַחִיצוֹן, וְהַפְּנִימִי מְכַפֵּר. לְמַה הַדָּבָר דּוֹמֶה, לְמַפְרִישׁ חַטָּאתוֹ וְאָבְדָה וְהִפְרִישׁ אַחֶרֶת תַּחְתֶּיהָ וְאַחַר כָּךְ נִמְצֵאת הָרִאשׁוֹנָה, וַהֲרֵי שְׁתֵּיהֶן עוֹמְדוֹת. שָׁחַט שְׁתֵּיהֶן בִּפְנִים, פָּטוּר. שָׁחַט שְׁתֵּיהֶן בַּחוּץ, חַיָּב. אַחַת בִּפְנִים וְאַחַת בַּחוּץ, פָּטוּר. אַחַת בַּחוּץ וְאַחַת בִּפְנִים, חַיָּב עַל הַחִיצוֹנָה, וְהַפְּנִימִית מְכַפֶּרֶת. כְּשֵׁם שֶׁדָּמָהּ פּוֹטֵר אֶת בְּשָׂרָהּ, כָּךְ הוּא פוֹטֵר אֶת בְּשַׂר חֲבֶרְתָּהּ:
1. One who slaughters an offering outside the Temple courtyard and one who offers it up outside the Temple courtyard is liable for the slaughter and liable for the offering up, as each act involves an independent prohibition. If done intentionally, he is liable to receive excision from the World-to-Come [karet] for each act, and if done unwittingly, he is liable to bring a sin offering for each act. Rabbi Yosei HaGelili says: If he slaughtered an offering inside the courtyard and then offered it up outside the courtyard, he is liable. But if he slaughtered it outside, thereby rendering it unfit, and then he offered it up outside, he is exempt for the offering up, as he offered up only an item that is unfit, and one is liable only for offering up an item that is fit to be offered up inside the Temple. The Rabbis said to him: According to your reasoning, even in a case where he slaughters it inside and offers it up outside, he should be exempt, since the moment that he took it outside the courtyard, he thereby rendered it unfit. Yet, in such a case, he is certainly liable for offering it up. So too, one who slaughters an offering outside and then offers it up outside is liable.
2. One who is ritually impure who ate sacrificial food, whether it was ritually impure sacrificial food or ritually pure sacrificial food, is liable to receive karet if he did so intentionally and to bring a sliding-scale offering if he did so unwittingly. Rabbi Yosei HaGelili says: An impure person who ate pure sacrificial food is liable. But an impure person who ate impure sacrificial food is exempt, as he merely ate an impure item, and the prohibition against eating sacrificial food while one is impure applies only to pure sacrificial food. The Rabbis said to him: According to your logic, this halakha would apply even in a case of an impure person who ate what had been pure sacrificial food, because once he touched it, he thereby rendered it ritually impure. Yet, in such a case, he is certainly liable for eating it. So too, an impure person who ate impure sacrificial food is liable. And a pure person who ate impure sacrificial food is exempt, as one is liable for eating sacrificial food in impurity only due to the impurity of one’s body, but not due to the impurity of the food.
3. There is a greater stringency with regard to slaughtering outside the Temple courtyard than with regard to offering up outside, and there is a greater stringency with regard to offering up outside than with regard to slaughtering outside. The mishna elaborates: The greater stringency with regard to slaughtering outside is that one who slaughters an offering outside the Temple courtyard even for the sake of an ordinary purpose, not for the sake of God, is liable. But one who offers up an offering outside the courtyard for the sake of an ordinary purpose is exempt. The greater stringency with regard to offering up outside is that two people who grasped a knife and together slaughtered an offering outside the courtyard are exempt. But if two grasped a limb from an offering and together offered it up outside, they are liable. If one unwittingly offered up part of an offering outside the courtyard and then in a different lapse of awareness offered up other parts of that offering and then again, in another lapse of awareness, offered up yet other parts, he is liable to bring a sin offering for each act of offering up; this is the statement of Rabbi Shimon. Rabbi Yosei says: He is liable to bring only one sin offering. Rabbi Yosei adds: And one is liable for offering up an offering outside the courtyard only once he offers it up at the top of an altar that was erected there. Rabbi Shimon says: Even if he offered it up on a rock or on a stone, not an altar, he is liable.
4. With regard to both fit sacrificial animals, and unfit sacrificial animals whose disqualification occurred in sanctity, i.e., in the course of the Temple service, and one sacrificed them outside the Temple courtyard, he is liable. One who offers up outside the courtyard an olive-bulk made up of the flesh of a burnt offering and of its sacrificial portions is liable. If there is a meal offering from which a handful was not removed, and one sacrificed it outside the Temple courtyard, he is exempt from liability, because until the handful is actually removed it is not fit to be burned on the altar inside the Temple. But if a priest took a handful from it and then returned its handful into the remainder of the meal offering, and one sacrificed the entire mixture outside the courtyard, he is liable, as once the handful has been removed it is fit to be burned on the altar inside the Temple, and one is liable for offering it up outside even though it is mixed into the remainder. With regard to the handful of a meal offering, the frankincense, the incense, the meal offering of priests, the meal offering of the anointed priest, and the meal offering brought with the libations that accompany animal offerings, in a case where one sacrificed even an olive-bulk from any one of these, which should be sacrificed on the altar, outside the Temple, he is liable, as the burning of an olive-bulk is considered a proper burning. Rabbi Eliezer deems him exempt unless he sacrifices the whole of any one of these items outside the Temple. But Rabbi Eliezer concedes that with regard to any of them that one sacrificed inside the courtyard but left over an olive-bulk from them and then sacrificed that olive-bulk outside the courtyard, he is liable. And with regard to any of these offerings that were lacking any amount, if one sacrifices it outside the courtyard, he is exempt.
5. One who sacrifices sacrificial meat, which is eaten, and sacrificial portions, i.e., those that are to be burned on the altar, outside the courtyard, is liable for the sacrifice of the sacrificial portions. But he is not liable for sacrificing the meat. If there is a meal offering from which a handful was not removed, and one sacrificed it outside the Temple courtyard, he is exempt from liability, because until the handful is actually removed it is not fit to be burned on the altar inside the Temple. But if a priest took a handful from it and then returned its handful into the remainder of the meal offering, and one sacrificed the entire mixture outside the courtyard, he is liable, as once the handful has been removed it is fit to be burned on the altar inside the Temple, and one is liable for offering it up outside even though it is mixed into the remainder.
6. The burning of both the handful and the frankincense permits the consumption of the remainder of the meal offering by the priests. With regard to the handful and the frankincense, in a case where one sacrificed only one of them outside the Temple courtyard, he is liable. Rabbi Eliezer exempts from liability one who burns only one of them until he also sacrifices the second. Since the remainder of the meal offering becomes permitted only once both have been burned, he considers each one alone to be an incomplete offering, and he holds one is not liable for sacrificing only one of them. Rabbi Eliezer concedes that if one sacrificed one inside the courtyard and one outside the courtyard, he is liable. The burning of two bowls of frankincense permits the consumption of the shewbread. With regard to the two bowls of frankincense, in a case where one sacrificed only one of them outside the courtyard, he is liable. Rabbi Eliezer exempts from liability one who burns only one of them until he also sacrifices the second, since the shewbread becomes permitted only once both bowls of frankincense are burned. Rabbi Eliezer concedes that if one sacrificed one inside the courtyard and one outside the courtyard, he is liable. One who sprinkles part of the blood of an offering, e.g., one sprinkling instead of four, outside the Temple courtyard is liable. Rabbi Elazar says: So too, one who pours as a libation water consecrated for the libation of the festival of Sukkot, during the Festival, outside the courtyard, is liable. Rabbi Neḥemya says: For the remainder of the blood of an offering that was supposed to be poured at the base of the altar and that instead one sacrificed outside the courtyard, one is liable.
7. One who pinches the nape of a bird offering inside the Temple courtyard and then offers it up outside the courtyard is liable. But if one pinched its nape outside the courtyard and then offered it up outside the courtyard he is exempt, as pinching the nape of a bird outside the courtyard is not considered valid pinching. One who slaughters, with a knife, a bird offering inside the courtyard and offers it up outside the courtyard is exempt, as slaughtering a bird offering in the Temple courtyard disqualifies it as an offering. But if one slaughtered a bird offering outside the courtyard and then offered it up outside, he is liable. Evidently, the manner of its preparation inside the courtyard, i.e., pinching, effects its exemption outside the courtyard, and the manner of its preparation outside the courtyard, i.e., slaughter, effects its exemption inside the courtyard. Rabbi Shimon says: With regard to any act of killing an animal concerning which, when it was performed outside the courtyard, one is liable for subsequently offering it up outside the courtyard, one is also liable for having offered the animal up outside the courtyard after performing a similar act of killing inside the courtyard. This is the halakha except with regard to one who slaughters a bird inside the courtyard and offers it up outside the courtyard; he is exempt.
8. With regard to a sin offering where one collected its blood in one cup, if he first placed its blood on an altar outside the courtyard and then placed the remaining blood on the altar inside the courtyard, or if he first placed its blood on the altar inside the courtyard and then placed the remaining blood on an altar outside the courtyard, in both cases he is liable for placing the blood outside the courtyard, as the blood in its entirety is fit to be placed on the altar inside the courtyard. If one collected its blood in two cups and placed the blood from both of them on the altar inside the courtyard he is exempt as he acted appropriately. If he placed the blood from both of them on an altar outside the courtyard, he is liable, as both are fit to be placed inside. If he first placed the blood from one cup inside and then placed the blood from the other one outside, he is exempt. By using the blood of the first cup to perform the mitzva of placing the blood on the altar, he thereby rendered the blood in the second cup unfit to be placed on the altar; therefore, there is no liability for placing it on an altar outside. If he first placed the blood from one cup outside and then placed the blood from the other one inside, he is liable for the external placement as that blood was fit to be placed inside, and the internal placement atones for the transgression for which the sin offering was brought. To what is this matter comparable? It is comparable to a case where one separated an animal for his sin offering and it was lost, and he separated another animal in its place, and thereafter, the first animal was found. In that case, both of them stand before him and he must sacrifice one as his sin offering. If he slaughtered both of them inside the courtyard, he is exempt. If he slaughtered both of them outside the courtyard, he is liable, as each was fit to be slaughtered in the courtyard. If he first slaughtered one inside and then slaughtered the other one outside he is exempt from liability for slaughtering the second, as he has already fulfilled his obligation with the first, thereby rendering the second one unfit for sacrifice. If he first slaughtered one outside and then slaughtered the other one inside he is liable for slaughtering the external animal outside the courtyard, as it was fit to be slaughtered inside, and the internal animal atones for the transgression for which the sin offering was brought. The mishna adds: In a case where one slaughtered both inside the courtyard, just as placing the blood of the first animal exempts one who consumes its meat from liability for misuse of consecrated property, so too, it exempts one who consumes the meat of its counterpart, the second animal, from liability.
גמרא
כִּי אָתָא רַב דִּימִי אָמַר רִבִּי בִּשְׁלשָה מְקוֹמוֹת שָׁרְתָה שְׁכִינָה עַל יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּשִׁילֹה וְנוֹב וְגִבְעוֹן וּבֵית עוֹלָמִים וּבְכֻלָּן לֹא שָׁרְתָה אֶלָּא בְּחֵלֶק בִּנְיָמִין שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (דברים ל') חוֹפֵף עָלָיו כָּל הַיּוֹם כָּל חֲפִיפוֹת לֹא יְהוּ אֶלָּא בְחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל בִּנְיָמִין. כִּי אָזִיל אַבַּיֵּי אֲמָרָהּ קָמֵיהּ דְּרַב יוֹסֵף אָמַר חַד בְּרָא הֲוָה לֵיהּ לְכַיְילִיל וְלֹא מִיתְקַן וְהָכְתִיב (תהלים ע''ח) וַיִּטּש מִשְׁכַּן שִׁילֹה וּכְתִיב (שם) וַיִּמְאַס בְּאֹהֶל יוֹסֵף וּבְשֵׁבֶט אֶפְרַיִם לֹא בָחָר. אָמַר רַב אַדָּא מָאי קָא קַשְׁיָא לֵיה דִּילְמָא שְׁכִינָה בְּחֵלֶק בִּנְיָמִין וְסַנְהֵדְרֵי גְדוֹלָה בְּחֵלֶק יוֹסֵף מִדְמָצִינוּ בְּבֵית עוֹלָמִים דִּשְׁכִינָה בְּחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל בִּנְיָמִין וְסַנְהֶדְרִין בְּחֵלֶק יְהוּדָה. אַמְרֵי הָכִי הַשְׁתָּא הָתָם מִיקַרְבָן נַחֲלוֹת גַּבֵי הֲדָדֵי הָכָא מִי מִיקַרְבָן הָכָא נַמֵּי מִיקַרְבָן כִּדְאָמַר רַב חָמָא בַּר חֲנִינָא רְצוּעָה הָיְתָה יוֹצֵאת מֵחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל יְהוּדָה וְנִכְנֶסֶת לְחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל בִּנְיָמִין וּבָהּ הָיָה מִזְבֵּחַ בָּנוּי וְהָיָה בִּנְיָמִין הַצַדִּיק מִצְטַעֵר עָלֶיהָ לְבוֹלְעָהּ. הָכָא נַמֵּי רְצוּעָה הָיְתָה יוֹצֵאת מֵחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל יוֹסֵף לְחֶלְקוֹ שֶׁל בִּנְיָמִין וְהַיְינוּ דִכְתִיב (יהושע ט''ז) תַּאֲנַת שִׁילֹה. כְּתַנָּאֵי חוֹפֵף עָלָיו זֶה מִקְדָּשׁ רִאשׁוֹן. כָּל הַיּוֹם זֶה מִקְדָּשׁ שֵׁנִי. וּבֵין כְּתֵפָיו שָׁכֵן אֵלּוּ יְמוֹת הַמָּשִׁיחַ. רִבִּי אוֹמֵר חוֹפֵף עָלָיו זֶה הָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה כָּל הַיּוֹם אֵלּוּ יְמוֹת הַמָּשִׁיחַ וּבֵין כְּתֵפָיו שָׁכֵן זֶה הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא:
§ When Rav Dimi came from Eretz Yisrael to Babylonia, he said that Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said: The Divine Presence rested upon the Jewish people in three places: In Shiloh, and Nov and Gibeon, and the Eternal House, and in all of those the Divine Presence rested only in the portion of the tribe of Benjamin, as it is stated in Moses’ blessing to Benjamin: “The beloved of the Lord shall dwell in safety by Him; He covers him all the day and He dwells between his shoulders” (Deuteronomy 33:12), meaning: All coverings, i.e., times of resting of the Divine Presence upon the Jewish people, shall be only in the portion of Benjamin.
The Gemara relates that when Abaye went to study Torah with Rav Yosef, he said the statement of Rav Dimi before Rav Yosef. Rav Yosef said in response: Kaylil, Abaye’s father, had one son, and he is not proper. But isn’t it written with regard to the Tabernacle in Shiloh: “And He forsook the Tabernacle of Shiloh” (Psalms 78:60); and it is written: “Moreover He abhorred the tent of Joseph, and chose not the tribe of Ephraim” (Psalms 78:67)? These verses indicate that the Tabernacle in Shiloh was in the portion of Joseph, not of Benjamin.
Rav Adda said: What is Rav Yosef’s difficulty from that verse? Perhaps the Tabernacle was in both the portion of Benjamin and that of Joseph. The Divine Presence was in the portion of Benjamin, and the Great Sanhedrin, which sits adjacent to the location of the Divine Presence, was in the portion of Joseph. This is similar to what we found in the case of the Eternal House, where the Divine Presence was in the portion of Benjamin and the Sanhedrin was in the portion of Judah.
Rav Yosef said to him in response: How can these cases be compared? There, in the Temple in Jerusalem, the portions of Benjamin and Judah were close to each other, and a division in which the Temple was located in the portion of one tribe while the Sanhedrin was located in the portion of another was possible. Here, with regard to Shiloh, are Shiloh and the portion of Benjamin close to each other? The Gemara replies: Here too they are close, as Rabbi Ḥama, son of Rabbi Ḥanina, says: A strip of land protruded from the portion of Judah and entered into the portion of Benjamin, and the altar in the Temple was built on that strip. And the tribe of Benjamin the righteous would agonize over it every day, desiring to take it into its portion, due to its unique sanctity.
Here too, with regard to the Tabernacle in Shiloh, a strip of land protruded from the portion of Joseph and entered into the portion of Benjamin, which connected Shiloh to the portion of Benjamin, and it was upon that strip, which had the status of Benjamin’s portion, that the Tabernacle stood. And that is what it means concerning that which is written with regard to the boundary of Joseph: “And the border turned about eastward to Taanath Shiloh” (Joshua 16:6), which in this context, is interpreted as meaning that the tribe of Benjamin would bemoan the fact that the Tabernacle in Shiloh was not located entirely in its portion.
The Gemara notes that the dispute between the amora’im with regard to the tribe in which the Tabernacle in Shiloh was located is like a dispute between tanna’im, as it is taught with regard to Moses’ blessing to Benjamin: “He covers him”; this is a reference to the First Temple. “All the day”; this is a reference to the Second Temple. “And He dwells between his shoulders”; this is a reference to the messianic era.
Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi says: “He covers him”; this is a reference to this world. “All the day”; this is a reference to the messianic era. “And He dwells between his shoulders”; this is a reference to the World-to-Come. According to the opinion of the Rabbis, the Divine Presence dwelled in the portion of Benjamin from the first Temple period and onward, but not during the period of the Tabernacle in Shiloh, when it was in the portion of Joseph. However, according to the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi, the entire period that the Divine Presence dwelled in this world, including the period of Shiloh, it did so in the portion of Benjamin.
זוהר
וּמֹשֶׁה הָיָה רוֹעֶה אֶת צֹאן יִתְרוֹ חוֹתְנוֹ כֹּהֵן מִדְיָן רִבִּי חִיָּיא פָּתַח וְאָמַר (תהלים כ''ג) מִזְמוֹר לְדָוִד יְיָ רוֹעִי לֹא אֶחְסָר. כְּלוֹמַר יְיָ רוֹעִי יְיָ הָרוֹעֶה שֶׁלִּי מַה הָרוֹעֶה מַנְהִיג אֶת הַצֹאן וּמוֹלִיכָם לְמִרְעֶה טוֹב לְמִרְעֶה שָׁמֵן בִּמְקוֹם נַחֲלֵי מַיִם מְיַישֵּׁר הֲלִיכָתָן בְּצֶדֶק וּבְמִשְׁפָּט אַף הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא כְּתִיב בִּנְאוֹת דֶּשֶׁא יַרְבִּיצֵנִי עַל מֵי מְנוּחוֹת יְנַהֲלֵנִי נַפְשִׁי יְשׁוֹבֵב. אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי דֶּרֶךְ הָרוֹעִים לִנְהוֹג בְּצֶדֶק אֶת צֹאנוֹ לְהַרְחִיקָם מִן הַגֶּזֶל לְהַנְהִיגָם בְּמִישׁוֹר וְהַשֵּׁבֶט בְּיָדוֹ שֶׁלֹּא יַטּוּ יָמִין וּשְׂמֹאל כָּךְ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא רוֹעֶה אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל לְהַנְהִיגָם בְּמִישׁוֹר וּבְכָל עֵת הַשֵּׁבֶט בְּיָדוֹ שֶׁלֹּא יַטּוּ יָמִין וּשְׂמֹאל. דָּבָר אַחֵר וּמֹשֶׁה הָיָה רוֹעֶה אָמַר רִבִּי יוֹסֵי תֵּדַע לָךְ שֶׁכָּל זְמַן שֶׁהָרוֹעֶה חָכָם לְנַהֵל אֶת צֹאנוֹ הוּא מוּכָן לְקַבֵּל עוֹל מַלְכוּת שָׁמַיִם וְאִם הָרוֹעֶה שׁוֹטֶה עָלָיו נִקְרָא (משלי כ''ו) תִּקְוָה לִכְסִיל מִמֶּנּוּ. אָמַר רִבִּי יְהוּדָה מֹשֶׁה חָכָם הָיָה וּבָקִי לִנְהוֹג אֶת צֹאנוֹ. בֹּא וּרְאֵה מִדָּוִד שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (שמואל א' ט''ז) וְהִנֵּה רוֹעֶה בַּצֹאן לְלַמְּדָךְ שֶׁדָּוִד חָכָם גָּדוֹל הָיָה וְהָיָה רוֹעֶה צֹאנוֹ כַּדִּין וְכַשּׁוּרָה לְפִיכָךְ עָשָׂהוּ הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא מֶלֶךְ עַל כָּל יִשְׂרָאֵל וְלָמָּה צֹאן וְלֹא בָקָר אָמַר רִבִּי יְהוּדָה יִשְׂרָאֵל נִקְרָאִים צֹאן שֶׁנֶּאֱמַר (יחזקאל ל''ד) וְאַתֵּן צֹאנִי צֹאן מַרְעִיתִי אָדָם אַתֶּם. וּכְתִיב (שם ל''ו) כְּצֹאן קָדָשִׁים כְּצֹאן יְרוּשָׁלַם. מַה הַצֹאן כְּשֶׁיִּקָּרְבוּ עַל הַמִּזְבֵּחַ בִּשְׁבִילָם זוֹכֶה לְחַיֵּי הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא כָּךְ הַמַּנְהִיג לְיִשְׂרָאֵל כַּדִּין וְכַשּׁוּרָה בִּשְׁבִילָם זוֹכֶה לְחַיֵּי הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא. וְעוֹד הָרוֹעֶה אֶת הַצֹאן כְּשֶׁהַצֹאן יוֹלְדוֹת הָרוֹעֶה נוֹטֵל אוֹתָם טְלָאִים בְּחֵיקוֹ כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִלְאוּ וְיִגְעוּ וּמוֹלִיכָם אַחֲרֵי אִמּוֹתָם וּמְרַחֵם עֲלֵיהֶם כָּךְ הַמַּנְהִיג לְיִשְׂרָאֵל צָרִיךְ לְהַנְהִילָם בְּרַחֲמִים וְלֹא בְאַכְזָרִיּוּת. וְכֵן אָמַר מֹשֶׁה כִּי תֹאמַר אֵלַי שָׂאֵהוּ בְחֵיקֶךָ וְגוֹמֵר. מַה הָרוֹעֶה אֶת הַצֹאן כְּשֶׁהוּא רוֹעֶה טוֹב מַצִיל אֶת הַצֹאן מִן הַזְּאֵבִים וּמִן הָאֲרָיוֹת כָּךְ הַמַּנְהִיג לְיִשְׂרָאֵל אִם הוּא טוֹב מַצִילָן מִן הָאוּמוֹת עוֹבְדֵי עֲבוֹדָה זָרָה וּמִדִּין שֶׁל מַטָּה וּמִדִּין שֶׁל מַעְלָה וּמַדְרִיכָן לְחַיֵּי הָעוֹלָם הַבָּא כָּךְ מֹשֶׁה רוֹעֶה נֶאֱמָן הָיָה וְרָאָה הַקָּדוֹשׁ בָּרוּךְ הוּא שֶׁכְּדַאי הוּא לִרְעוֹת אֶת יִשְׂרָאֵל בְּאוֹתוֹ הַדִּין מַמָּשׁ שֶׁהָיָה רוֹעֶה אֶת הַצֹאן לַכְּשָׂבִים כְּפִי הָרָאוּי לָהֶם וְהַנְּקֵבוֹת כְּפִי הָרָאוּי לָהֶן. וּלְפִיכָךְ כְּתִיב וּמֹשֶׁה הָיָה רוֹעֶה אֶת צֹאן יִתְרוֹ חוֹתְנוֹ וְלֹא שֶׁלּוֹ.
הלכה פסוקה
א. הַפּוֹרֵשׁ מִדַּרְכֵי צִבּוּר אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁלֹּא עָבַר עֲבֵרוֹת אֶלָּא נִבְדַּל מֵעֲדַת יִשְׂרָאֵל וְאֵינוֹ עוֹשֶׂה מִצְוֹת בִּכְלָלָן וְלֹא נִכְנַס בְצָרָתָן וְלֹא מִתְעַנֶה בְּתַעֲנִיתָן אֶלָּא הוֹלֵךְ בְּדַרְכּוֹ כְּאֶחָד מֵהַנָּכְרִים וּכְאִלּוּ אֵינוֹ מֵהֶן אֵין לוֹ חֵלֶק לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא:
ב. הָעוֹשֶׂה עֲבֵרוֹת בְּיָד רָמָה כִּיהוֹיָקִים בֵּין שֶׁעָשָׂה קַלּוֹת בֵּין שֶׁעָשָׂה חֲמוּרוֹת אֵין לוֹ חֵלֶק לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא וְזֶה הַנִּקְרָא מְגַלֶּה פָנִים בַּתּוֹרָה מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהֵעִיז מִצְחוֹ וְגִלָּה פָנָיו וְלֹא בוֹשׁ מִדִּבְרֵי תּוֹרָה:
ג. שְׁנַיִם הֵם הַמּוֹסְרִים הַמּוֹסֵר חֲבֵרוֹ בְיַד נָכְרִים לְהָרְגוֹ אוֹ לְהַכּוֹתוֹ וְהַמּוֹסֵר מָמוֹן חֲבֵרוֹ בְּיַד נָכְרִים אוֹ בְּיַד אַנָּס שֶׁהוּא כְּנָכְרִי וּשְׁנֵיהֶם אֵין לָהֶם חֵלֶק לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא:
One who secedes from the paths of the congregation, although he committed no transgressions, but remains separated from the congregation of Israel, observes no commandments together with them, does not include himself in their troubles, nor afflicts himself on their fast-days, but follows his own path as the rest of the people of the land, acting as if he was not one of them, he has no share in the World to Come. One who commits transgressions high-handedly like Jehoiakim,20See II. Kings, 23.36. G. whether his acts were against minor or against major commandments, he has no share in the World to Come. Verily, he is one of whom it is said: "He reveals a face in the Torah not according to law", seeing that he hardened his forehead, exposed his face and is not ashamed to disobey the Torah.21See Supra, (8). G.
There are two categories of informers: (1) he who informs against his neighbor so that he be turned over to an idolatrous hand either to be put to death or to be maltreated; (2) he who informs against his neighbor so that his money be turned over to an idolatrous hand, or to the hand of a robber, who is like an idolater; both categories of such have no share in the World to come.22See Rosh ha-Shanah, 16a-17b; and Yoma, 86a–87b. G.
מוסר
ספר חרדים דף ע"ב ע"א
הָעוֹלָם הַזֶּה יָם סוֹעֵר צָרִיךְ לְדַמּוֹת הָאָדָם בְּדַעְתּוֹ כְּאִלּוּ הוּא שָׁט בַּיָּם וְלָכֵן יָרִים רֹאשׁוֹ לְמַעְלָה לְיוֹצְרוֹ וְיִזָּהֵר פֶּן יִכָּנְסוּ בְּפִיו הַמַּיִם הַזֵּידוֹנִים וְיִשָּׁמֵר מִן הַגַּלִּים הַבָּאִים לְטוֹרְדוֹ וְאִם לָאו דָמוֹ בְרֹאשׁוֹ. בֶּן אָדָם סֻכַּת שָׁלוֹם פְּרוֹס עַל רֹאשְׁךָ וּבֵיתְךָ בְּכָל עוֹז וְתוֹקֶף וְהָלַכְתָּ בִּדְרָכָיו דִּכְתִיב (ישעיה מ''ה) עוֹשֶׂה שָׁלוֹם וגו' וּפֵירְשׁוּ בְּזוֹהַר מִדִּכְתִיב עוֹשֶׂה וְלֹא עָשָׂה שֶׁתָּמִיד עוֹשֶׂה לָכֵן גַּם אַתָּה תָּמִיד תַּעֲשֶׂה שָׁלוֹם. דְּמוּת הַלָּשׁוֹן חֶרֶב חַדָּה לְאַנְשֵׁי הַמִּלְחָמָה הַצַדִּיקִים נִלְחָמִים בָּה נֶגֶד יִצְרָם הָרָע וַחֲיָילָיו. הָרְשָׁעִים נֶגֶד יִצְרָם הַטּוֹב וַחֲיָילָיו. כְּתִיב (תהלים קי''ט) סֵעֲפִים שָׂנֵאתִי וְתוֹרָתְךָ אָהָבְתִּי וּכְתִיב (שם) אַשְׁרֵי תְמִימֵי דָרֶךְ הַהוֹלְכִים בְּתוֹרַת ה' וּכְתִיב (שם נ''ה) הַשְׁלֵךְ עַל ה' יְהָבְךָ הַכַּוָּנה כִּי כַּמָּה זְמַן אָדָם מְאַבֵּד בְּיָדָיו לָרִיק בְּחָשְׁבוֹ עַל עִנְיָינֵי עוֹלָמוֹ וּפַרְנָסְתוֹ וְסוֹף אָדָם לַהֶבֶל דָמָה כְּלוֹמַר מְהַרְהֵר וּמְחַשֵּׁב וּמְבַטֵּל זְמַנּוֹ וְאֵינוֹ מַשְׁגִּיחַ כִּי יָמָיו כַּצֵל עוֹבֵר וּבְעוֹד שֶׁהוּא מְחַשֵּׁב וּמְהַרְהֵר יַעֲשֶׂה חֲבִילוֹת שֶׁל תּוֹרָה וּמִצְוֹת לָעוֹלָם הַבָּא. וְאַתְיָא מִכְּלָלָא רַב הַשָּׁלוֹם הוּא יְסוֹ''ד הַמַּעֲלֶה יָקוּץ מִתַּרְדֵּמָתוֹ לְתַקֵּן אֲשֶׁר עִוֵּת וְלִיסוֹ''ד אָרֶץ: