Trust in Hashem's plan, fighting for one's autonomy and Jewish particularism. Painfully topical parasha or a tale of courage and self-acceptance?

(י) וַיֹּ֖אמֶר מֶ֣ה עָשִׂ֑יתָ ק֚וֹל דְּמֵ֣י אָחִ֔יךָ צֹעֲקִ֥ים אֵלַ֖י מִן־הָֽאֲדָמָֽה׃
(10) Then He said, “What have you done? Hark, your brother’s blood cries out to Me from the ground!
(כז) וַיְסַפְּרוּ־לוֹ֙ וַיֹּ֣אמְר֔וּ בָּ֕אנוּ אֶל־הָאָ֖רֶץ אֲשֶׁ֣ר שְׁלַחְתָּ֑נוּ וְ֠גַ֠ם זָבַ֨ת חָלָ֥ב וּדְבַ֛שׁ הִ֖וא וְזֶה־פִּרְיָֽהּ׃ (כח) אֶ֚פֶס כִּֽי־עַ֣ז הָעָ֔ם הַיֹּשֵׁ֖ב בָּאָ֑רֶץ וְהֶֽעָרִ֗ים בְּצֻר֤וֹת גְּדֹלֹת֙ מְאֹ֔ד וְגַם־יְלִדֵ֥י הָֽעֲנָ֖ק רָאִ֥ינוּ שָֽׁם׃
(27) This is what they told him: “We came to the land you sent us to; it does indeed flow with milk and honey, and this is its fruit. (28) However, the people who inhabit the country are powerful, and the cities are fortified and very large; moreover, we saw the Anakites there.
(ל) וַיַּ֧הַס כָּלֵ֛ב אֶת־הָעָ֖ם אֶל־מֹשֶׁ֑ה וַיֹּ֗אמֶר עָלֹ֤ה נַעֲלֶה֙ וְיָרַ֣שְׁנוּ אֹתָ֔הּ כִּֽי־יָכ֥וֹל נוּכַ֖ל לָֽהּ׃
(30) Caleb hushed the people before Moses and said, “Let us by all means go up, and we shall gain possession of it, for we shall surely overcome it.”
(לב) וַיֹּצִ֜יאוּ דִּבַּ֤ת הָאָ֙רֶץ֙ אֲשֶׁ֣ר תָּר֣וּ אֹתָ֔הּ אֶל־בְּנֵ֥י יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל לֵאמֹ֑ר הָאָ֡רֶץ אֲשֶׁר֩ עָבַ֨רְנוּ בָ֜הּ לָת֣וּר אֹתָ֗הּ אֶ֣רֶץ אֹכֶ֤לֶת יוֹשְׁבֶ֙יהָ֙ הִ֔וא וְכׇל־הָעָ֛ם אֲשֶׁר־רָאִ֥ינוּ בְתוֹכָ֖הּ אַנְשֵׁ֥י מִדּֽוֹת׃ (לג) וְשָׁ֣ם רָאִ֗ינוּ אֶת־הַנְּפִילִ֛ים בְּנֵ֥י עֲנָ֖ק מִן־הַנְּפִלִ֑ים וַנְּהִ֤י בְעֵינֵ֙ינוּ֙ כַּֽחֲגָבִ֔ים וְכֵ֥ן הָיִ֖ינוּ בְּעֵינֵיהֶֽם׃
(32) Thus they spread calumnies among the Israelites about the land they had scouted, saying, “The country that we traversed and scouted is one that devours its settlers. All the people that we saw in it are men of great size; (33) we saw the Nephilim there—the Anakites are part of the Nephilim—and we looked like grasshoppers to ourselves, and so we must have looked to them.”
(ח) אִם־חָפֵ֥ץ בָּ֙נוּ֙ יְהֹוָ֔ה וְהֵבִ֤יא אֹתָ֙נוּ֙ אֶל־הָאָ֣רֶץ הַזֹּ֔את וּנְתָנָ֖הּ לָ֑נוּ אֶ֕רֶץ אֲשֶׁר־הִ֛וא זָבַ֥ת חָלָ֖ב וּדְבָֽשׁ׃ (ט) אַ֣ךְ בַּיהֹוָה֮ אַל־תִּמְרֹ֒דוּ֒ וְאַתֶּ֗ם אַל־תִּֽירְאוּ֙ אֶת־עַ֣ם הָאָ֔רֶץ כִּ֥י לַחְמֵ֖נוּ הֵ֑ם סָ֣ר צִלָּ֧ם מֵעֲלֵיהֶ֛ם וַֽיהֹוָ֥ה אִתָּ֖נוּ אַל־תִּירָאֻֽם׃
(8) If the LORD is pleased with us, He will bring us into that land, a land that flows with milk and honey, and give it to us; (9) only you must not rebel against the LORD. Have no fear then of the people of the country, for they are our prey: their protection has departed from them, but the LORD is with us. Have no fear of them!”
Franz Rosenzweig in The Star of Redemption
Belonging to the most significant passages of our ancient law is the distinction between the usual war against a “very faraway” people, which was waged according to the universal rules of martial law for which war is a usual expression of like form of the State, and the war of faith against the “seven peoples” of Canaan, by which the people of God captured the necessary living space for it. In this distinction lies the new vision of war as a necessary act for God’s sake. The peoples of the Christian era can no longer uphold the distinction. In conformity with the spirit of Christianity that tolerates no borders, there are no “very faraway” peoples for them. That which Jewish law could separate as concerns its public law, war of faith and political war, is blended into one for them. Precisely because they are not real peoples of God, but only on the way to becoming so, they cannot draw those distinct borders; they cannot at all know how far
God’s will is realized in the warlike destinies of their States. Somehow—the how remains puzzling; the people must become accustomed to the idea of a possible destruction; whether as a people it will be used as a stone in the edifice of the Kingdom— the consciousness of the individual decides nothing concerning this; the war alone decides, which rages on above the consciousness of the individual.
Camille Shira Angel in Torah Queeries: Weekly Commentaries on the Hebrew Bible
[...] For many of us, as we considered coming out and living our lives as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender, it was as if we too were facing an ordeal of epic proportions, a territorial battle for autonomy and self-definition. Likewise, we too were faced with the imposing, if not threatening, dominant culture, the gigantic power and privilege of mainstream thinking.
In this passage of Torah, the contrast between the giants and the spies represents a duality between the Normative versus the Other, the Dominator versus the Dominated. The heavy residue of slave mentality veils the spies’ ability to see their own strength and the Divine shield. We do not know what the Anakites think of the Israelites, only what the insecure Israelites think of themselves. Feeling small and powerless, they internalize this deprecation, and it takes a whole new generation before they are able to realize their power.
There are many problems when we judge ourselves through the eyes of others, especially those with an agenda for suppression. “V’chen hayinu b’eneichem”—“and we must have looked like grasshoppers in their eyes, too.” In the Hasidic commentary Itturai Torah, the rabbis say that it was a sin for the spies to use those words.
Why? The rabbis continued, if you look at imposing people and say that you feel like a grasshopper, that is a reasonable thing to say because it is based on your feelings. But when you say, “We must have looked like grasshoppers in their eyes,” the Itturai Torah chides, “What difference should it make how we appeared to them?” What possible good is there in being concerned about how you appear in others’ eyes?
But among the twelve, there were two people, Joshua and Caleb, who filed a minority report. Caleb said, “Let us by all means go up, and we shall gain possession of it, for we shall surely overcome it.” “We’re not paying attention to how we think we might be perceived in others’ eyes. Yeah, they’re big and we’re about to embark on a task that is huge, but” “yachol, nuchal la,” “we know that we are able to do it.” Seeing ourselves through others’ eyes will not chart the direction that we need to take.
Perhaps the “sin”—“avon,” of the ten spies was to acquiesce to fear and lose sight of their authentic power. Internalizing a sense of inferiority, the Israelites lost confidence and became vulnerable to the inner voice of self-doubt and denigration. They felt paralyzed to move forward. After all, these people had been slaves descended from slaves. Their slave mentality, an overwhelmingly arresting sense of insecurity, grossly distorted their sense of being created in the image of the Divine; they felt incapable of creating new identities. This feeling is evidenced by their reaction to the spies’ message; they are initially inclined to return to Egypt upon hearing this news. Paradoxically, it is this sense of insecurity that does indeed reflect our being made in the image of God, and once they recognize this fact, they are able to transcend their insecurity and move forward.
Unable yet to come to this realization, the ten spies collude in blaming themselves for not having the necessary attributes to overcome the forces that they perceive as keeping them suppressed, whereas, truly, it is not the giants but their own insecure selves, in the shadow of this perceived threat, that are keeping them suppressed. By referring to themselves in dehumanizing terms, as “grasshoppers,” they allowed their own insecure, fear-based projections of themselves, represented by the ruling class, to define them. In reality, their world was not as dangerous as it appeared to be. Like- wise, LGBT folk sometimes make assumptions that the world is more dangerous than it is, whereas in reality, it may only appear to be so due to our own depleted confidence.
In contrast, Joshua and Caleb demonstrated hopeful resistance. Together they challenged the dispiriting impressions of their peers. They recognized that they could not advance their cause, their conquest of the Anakites, if the people had a diminished sense of hope, pride, and faith in themselves. Recognizing that their whole selves were made in the image of the Divine, insecurities and all, Joshua and Caleb were able to reveal this realization to the Israelites and rally them to conquer their fears and, in turn, the Anakites.
Like the Israelites, who were damaged by the effects of the negative reports, so we LGBT people have absorbed and internalized the historical, pervasive, and deeply embedded negative messages of homophobia, transphobia, and heterosexism. It is no wonder that many of us worry about being abnormal or would choose invisibility and try to pass as heterosexual—and that many Jews consider “fixing” their noses, taking on anglicized names, and making efforts to pass as gentiles. We have received a strong message, that it is dangerous to be like our own people and therefore different from the norm.
It is also very difficult to be true to ourselves and our uniqueness when the ways we are different from the dominant culture have been labeled as deviant, disgusting, and dangerous. When literature, history, books, art, movies, and television show a multifaceted, positive vision of the dominators and a single, negative vision of the dominated, then a person growing up female, of color, lesbian or gay, and the like has to work against the entire culture in order to develop a sense of pride and wholeness.
That is why it is so meaningful that our text has Caleb’s otherness recognized and rewarded by no less than the Divine, Godself. God is countering the negative self-image and engendering pride in its place. Therefore, we need to honor the different ways we see, feel, and understand, leading toward diversity and away from homogenization.
This is the greatness of Caleb—which merits him a comparison with Abraham. In chapter 14, verse 24, God says that God will single out Caleb and bring him into the Land—“ve ‘avdi Caleb ‘ekev hayita ruach acheret ‘imo . . .”—“And my servant Caleb, BECAUSE [‘ekev] there was a different spirit within him . . .” This word—‘ekev—is the word with which God uplifts Abraham at the Akeidah, granting him an eternal covenant “BECAUSE [‘ekev] you listened to my voice.”
Ibn Ezra understands Caleb as an individual who had the ability and “spirit” to take on new tasks, even in the face of adversity and opposition. “My servant Caleb, because he was imbued with a different spirit and remained loyal to Me, shall see the land that I promised on oath to their fathers; none of those who spurn Me shall see it” (Num. 14:24). His “ruach acheret,” literally “a different spirit,” empowered Caleb to enable nation building. I sense this tremendous spirit within our community as we express our different spirit, our spirit informed by the empathy of knowing what it is to be treated as Other, while never losing sight of our Divine imprint. This identification with the Other and this Divine fuel is what enables us as Jews and queers to move forward with our justice and equality agenda.
Caleb and Joshua were the two optimistic spies who God determined each had a ruach acheret, a “different spirit.” As long as queers are not grasshoppers in our own eyes, we can use this passage to cultivate within ourselves “a different spirit,” the spirit that brings with it the intrinsic qualities of compassion, courage, and perseverance.
As Jews, we take inspiration from our primary narrative about crossing the boundary between slavery into freedom. As queers, our experiences of wrestling the giants without and within help shape not only our memories of the past but also our actions in the present and our visions for the future. We celebrate the certain knowledge that our ruach acheret, our different spirit, coupled with our inherent ruach hakodesh, our sacred spirit, can be our guide on the individual and collective journey toward transformation.