Welcome to Chavruta Roulette, Chag Urim Sameach, and Happy Chanukah! We at Sefaria hope you will enjoy learning with this new feature. We'll let you and your chavruta get right to learning, but please be sure to fill out our short feedback survey (bit.ly/roulettefeedback) when you're done so we know how this went for you. It's listed at the bottom of the sheet as well!

Introduction
We often see Passover as a shining example of the importance of effective Jewish education, but Chanukah might intend to play a similar role as well. Though Chanukah is generally translated as "dedication," referring to "the (re)dedication of the Temple" (Chanukat HaBayit), the word Chanukah also shares a root with the word for education, or "chinuch":
(ו) חֲנֹ֣ךְ לַ֭נַּעַר עַל־פִּ֣י דַרְכּ֑וֹ גַּ֥ם כִּֽי־יַ֝זְקִ֗ין לֹֽא־יָס֥וּר מִמֶּֽנָּה׃
Educate (chanoch, חנך) a child according to their way. They will not swerve from it even in old age.
Interestingly, the above line can be translated either as "educate a child according to their way" or "educate a child in the way the ought to go." These present two distinct approaches to education, which get raised highlighted in a seemingly mundane Talmudic debate about lighting the Chanukah candles.
תָּנוּ רַבָּנַן: מִצְוַת חֲנוּכָּה, נֵר אִישׁ וּבֵיתוֹ. וְהַמְהַדְּרִין, נֵר לְכׇל אֶחָד וְאֶחָד. וְהַמְהַדְּרִין מִן הַמְהַדְּרִין, בֵּית שַׁמַּאי אוֹמְרִים: יוֹם רִאשׁוֹן מַדְלִיק שְׁמֹנָה, מִכָּאן וְאֵילָךְ פּוֹחֵת וְהוֹלֵךְ. וּבֵית הִלֵּל אוֹמְרִים: יוֹם רִאשׁוֹן מַדְלִיק אַחַת, מִכָּאן וְאֵילָךְ מוֹסִיף וְהוֹלֵךְ.
Beit Shammai say: On the first day one kindles eight lights and, from there on, gradually decreases the number of lights until, on the last day of Hanukkah, they kindle one light. And Beit Hillel say: On the first day one kindles one light, and from there on, gradually increases the number of lights until, on the last day, they kindle eight lights.
Guiding Questions (1:08-1:15)
- What does Beit Hillel's lighting vs Beit Shammai's look like? i.e. what is the choreography?
- Which intuitively makes more sense to you? One to eight, or eight to one?
- What do you think is behind the debate (machloket) between Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai?
אָמַר עוּלָּא: פְּלִיגִי בַּהּ תְּרֵי אָמוֹרָאֵי בְּמַעְרְבָא, רַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר אָבִין וְרַבִּי יוֹסֵי בַּר זְבִידָא. חַד אָמַר טַעְמָא דְּבֵית שַׁמַּאי כְּנֶגֶד יָמִים הַנִּכְנָסִין, וְטַעְמָא דְּבֵית הִלֵּל כְּנֶגֶד יָמִים הַיּוֹצְאִין...
One said that the reason for Beit Shammai’s opinion is that the number of lights corresponds to the incoming days, i.e., the potential number of days left. The reason for Beit Hillel’s opinion is that the number of lights corresponds to the outgoing days. Each day, the number of lights corresponds to the number of the days of Hanukkah that were already observed...
It's helpful to note that modern commentators have pointed out that, in general, as is the case in our Chanukah lighting, Beit Shammai's positions reflect attention towards and concern for potential events or distant outcomes, while Beit Hillel's reflect making decisions based on the actual case and considerations in front of him in that moment.
Keeping in mind that human beings are themselves described as candles or lights in the Jewish tradition, as in the following:
נֵ֣ר יְ֭הוָה נִשְׁמַ֣ת אָדָ֑ם...
The soul of man is the lamp/candle of God...
Discuss:
- Seeing the candles as a symbol of the human being, in Jewish education, to what extent do you think educators ought to meet students where they are (Beit Hillel) vs. where we think they should or can be (Beit Shammai)?
- How do you see this playing out practically in your own teaching or those with whom you work?

A "Modern" Take
Another lesson from understanding Proverbs 22:6 (above) in two different and arguably opposing ways is that two (or more) people can and oftentimes do look at a single object and see two completely different things. This, too, is relevant to the Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel debate.
The Talmud also offers the following explanation for the different practices, which is a basis for later comments by 20th-century rabbinic thinker, Rabbi Shlomo Yosef Zevin:
וְחַד אָמַר טַעְמָא דְּבֵית שַׁמַּאי כְּנֶגֶד פָּרֵי הַחַג, וְטַעְמָא דְּבֵית הִלֵּל דְּמַעֲלִין בַּקֹּדֶשׁ וְאֵין מוֹרִידִין.
And one said that the reason for Beit Shammai’s opinion is that the number of lights corresponds to the bulls of the festival of Sukkot: Thirteen were sacrificed on the first day and each succeeding day one fewer was sacrificed (Numbers 29:12–31). The reason for Beit Hillel’s opinion is that the number of lights is based on the principle: One elevates to a higher level in matters of sanctity and one does not downgrade.
The Talmud in Sukkah 55b says that these sacrificial bulls - which symbolize the 70 nations of the world - are a form of universal prayer on behalf of the non-Jewish world and are intended to bring about peace. This would suggest that Beit Shammai's decreasing count from eight candles to one culminates in unity across divisions.
Later sages, however, take thee opposite view. They explain that the decreasing candles of Beit Shammai represent the steady destruction of those nations that oppressed the Jews. This understanding fits one narrative of the Chanukah story. According to this interpretation, Beit Hillel's emphasis, then, is on the elevation and Jewish triumph in the Chanukah story. The net result is the same, but the framings differ significantly. Based on this latter understanding, Rabbi Zevin further elaborates on the differences between what Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel see when they look at the Chanukah candles:
Rabbi Shlomo Yosef Zevin (1888-1978, Belarus & Israel)
The light of the soul needs to dwell in the far corners of man, and to shed light on one’s whole body. And the light of Torah needs to be manifest now, and in the future, in all far corners of the world and to shed light on all that causes darkness in the universe...And fire symbolizes burning and the destruction of evil. Fire burns the evil forces that are in the soul of man...and fire destroys the evil forces that materialize in the whole world...Beit Hillel and Beit Shammai were debating what the primacy of man’s work is. Beit Shammai, characteristically, is strict: it is impossible for a person to be elevated to the high light unless they burn all the evil forces in their midsts...Beit Hillel is lenient, on the contrary, and through the light of Torah will the darkness of evil retreat. A little bit of light pushes out a lot of darkness by itself and automatically, and all the more so, a lot of light.
Guiding Questions (1:17-1:25)
- How does Rabbi Zevin explain the differences between Beit Shammai and Beit Hillel's approach to lighting candles?
- How does each of them perceive the candle's flame and its potential?
- As a learner yourself (or as a professional working in Jewish education), how has COVID-19 been a fire with respect to Jewish education? What has it destroyed or diminished in its wake?
- And where has it acted as a light, more positively providing opportunities or "expanding the palace of Torah" in new ways?
Before you go, please be sure to fill out our short feedback survey so we know how this went for you! You can find it here: bit.ly/roulettefeedback
