"Looking at Israel"
A.J. Wolf, KAM Isaiah Israel Bulletin, October 19, 1983
The Soviet Union brought down an unarmed civilian plane which was apparently overflying some of its sensitive military installations, causing loss of life and international protest.
The Soviet Union regularly ships guns to Central America in order to bring civic disorder and revolution.
The Soviet Union is headed by a hard-line former terrorist and spy who has resolutely opposed all moves for reduction of tensions.
The Soviet Union has invaded neighboring nations, occupied and subdued them, annexing whole populations of different conviction and background.
The Soviet Union has invaded neighboring nations, occupied and subdued them, annexing whole populations of different conviction and background.
The Soviet Union permits dissent and debate among elites, but no freedom for its occupied or second-class populations.
The Soviet Union has been repeatedly condemned by the international community but defends its actions by reminding the world national community but defends its actions by reminding the world that it is surrounded by much larger, hostile enemies who have refused to live with it in peace. In order to defend its right to exist, it has even quietly threatened the world with nuclear destruction.
Now go back and, in reading this piece, please substitute for "the Soviet Union," each time the term "the State of Israel."
Editor's note in Unfinished Rabbi, 1998, p. 149: The publication of this piece led to controversy and ferment at KAM Isaiah Israel; some were outraged at the comparison. Extensive public discussion, meetings, letters, and bulletin piece on all sides followed.
ISRAELIS SAID TO STEP UP ROLE AS ARMS SUPPLIERS TO LATINS
By Leslie H. Gelb, Special To the New York Times
Dec. 17, 1982
Obituary for Yitzhak Shamir, New York Times, June 30, 2012
THE EMERGENCE OF YURI ANDROPOV
By John M. Burns
Nov. 6, 1983
A.J. Wolf, KAM Isaiah Israel Bulletin, October 19, 1983
The Soviet Union brought down an unarmed civilian plane which was apparently overflying some of its sensitive military installations, causing loss of life and international protest.
The Soviet Union regularly ships guns to Central America in order to bring civic disorder and revolution.
The Soviet Union is headed by a hard-line former terrorist and spy who has resolutely opposed all moves for reduction of tensions.
The Soviet Union has invaded neighboring nations, occupied and subdued them, annexing whole populations of different conviction and background.
The Soviet Union has invaded neighboring nations, occupied and subdued them, annexing whole populations of different conviction and background.
The Soviet Union permits dissent and debate among elites, but no freedom for its occupied or second-class populations.
The Soviet Union has been repeatedly condemned by the international community but defends its actions by reminding the world national community but defends its actions by reminding the world that it is surrounded by much larger, hostile enemies who have refused to live with it in peace. In order to defend its right to exist, it has even quietly threatened the world with nuclear destruction.
Now go back and, in reading this piece, please substitute for "the Soviet Union," each time the term "the State of Israel."
Editor's note in Unfinished Rabbi, 1998, p. 149: The publication of this piece led to controversy and ferment at KAM Isaiah Israel; some were outraged at the comparison. Extensive public discussion, meetings, letters, and bulletin piece on all sides followed.
ISRAELIS SAID TO STEP UP ROLE AS ARMS SUPPLIERS TO LATINS
By Leslie H. Gelb, Special To the New York Times
Dec. 17, 1982
Obituary for Yitzhak Shamir, New York Times, June 30, 2012
THE EMERGENCE OF YURI ANDROPOV
By John M. Burns
Nov. 6, 1983
Why did Breira Implode: Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf’s Refusal to Take Funds from a Foreign Government
MAY 4, 2012, 3:57 PM
David Bedein
For some reason, some bloggers have seen fit of late to attack the integrity of the late Chicago Rabbi, Arnold Jacob Wolf, blaming him for having some kind of unethical and manipulative influence on President Obama and polemicist Peter Beinart, among others.
When someone is criticized while that person is alive, he can decide whether or not to respond to such “ad homonym” personalized attacks.
However, when a person’s integrity is attacked after he dies, that person has to depend on friends or family to preserve his memory and to protect his good name for posterity.
I was a friend of Rabbi Wolf.
As a community organizer of the Alinsky mode, I was appreciative of the advice that he would give, and his unique ability to show respect, even when we agreed to disagree.
What was never in question, in my mind, was the unquestionable integrity of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, and that is what I would like to address in these hours before Shabbat enters our home in Eretz Yisrael.
The following story addresses the intrinsic integrity of Rabbi Wolf.
MAY 4, 2012, 3:57 PM
David Bedein
For some reason, some bloggers have seen fit of late to attack the integrity of the late Chicago Rabbi, Arnold Jacob Wolf, blaming him for having some kind of unethical and manipulative influence on President Obama and polemicist Peter Beinart, among others.
When someone is criticized while that person is alive, he can decide whether or not to respond to such “ad homonym” personalized attacks.
However, when a person’s integrity is attacked after he dies, that person has to depend on friends or family to preserve his memory and to protect his good name for posterity.
I was a friend of Rabbi Wolf.
As a community organizer of the Alinsky mode, I was appreciative of the advice that he would give, and his unique ability to show respect, even when we agreed to disagree.
What was never in question, in my mind, was the unquestionable integrity of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, and that is what I would like to address in these hours before Shabbat enters our home in Eretz Yisrael.
The following story addresses the intrinsic integrity of Rabbi Wolf.
|
In February 1977, after four years of activity, the US based organization Breira, chaired by Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf. held its first and only national conference in Washington, DC. I was witness to the event, convened only one month after Jimmy Carter was sworn in as the US President. The Israel Labor Party was then in power in Jerusalem. Yitzhak Rabin was Prime Minister, Shimon Peres was Defense Minister and Yigal Allon was the Foreign Minister of Israel. Breira’s platform was to energize Jews in the diaspora to support the creation of a Palestinian Arab state in areas acquired by Israel ten years earlier, after the 1967 war. Shortly before the Breira conference, Golda Meir, Israel’s previous Labor Party Prime Minister, gave a seminal interview on Israel TV in which she repeated the Labor Party position at the time that there is no such thing as a Palestinian Arab people and she could not understand why and how Jews abroad could think of a Palestinian Arab state.. Yet the momentum of the Breira conference in DC, drawing on more than 100 Jewish communities from around North America, seemed unstoppable. Using pent up energies from Jewish involvement in the US civil rights movement and the anti Vietnam movement- only two years after the end of the Vietnam war, Breira showed that it was able to mobilize American Jews, and it had the makings of a real grass roots movement that challenged the norms of Israel at the time. I wrote at the time that the government of Israel should not underestimate the momentum that the idea for a Palestinian Arab state idea was gaining in the Jewish community, and that Israel should prepare itself for unprecedented Jewish pressure to support a Palestinian Arab State initiative , in tandem with a new US Administration that hinted that it would support the idea of a Palestinian Arab state. Only one month later, President Carter delivered a seminal speech in Clinton, Mass – the first time that a US President endorsed the concept of a Palestinian Arab State. So what happened to Breira? Why did Breira not capitalize on such support, after such a grandiose start, especially in light of Carter’s implicit support I asked that question of Rabbi Wolf, chairman of Breira, a few years after Breira had suddenly impoded. Rabbi Wolf explained what had transpired. Rabbi Wolf explained that representatives of the US State Department and the Carter Administration approached him, offering logistical support and funding to Breira, to bolster grass roots Jewish support for a Palestinian Arab state. Rabbi Wolf explained that such a US government initiative convinced him that he should disband Breira. Rabbi Wolf explained that while he wanted American Jews to support a Palestinian Arab state, he felt that it would be morally wrong to accept financial and logistical support for this effort from the US government. The late Rabbi Arthur Hertzberg, Rabbi Wolf’s cousin, then the chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish Organizations, confirmed to me that that the US administration has made these gestures to support Breira, and that he concurred with Rabbi Wolf’s decision to reject American government funding and logistical support. Rabbi Hertzberg, like Rabbi Wolf, also supported the concept of a Palestinian Arab State, even if the Israeli government did not favor the idea at the time. However, both Rabbi Hertzberg and Rabbi Wolf felt that it would morally incorrect for an grass roots Jewish effort to be coopted by the American government. A generation later, the Israeli Knesset Parliament continues to debate legislation that would require registration and monitoring of vast financial support that Diaspora and Israeli political organizations now receive from foreign governments to lobby for a Palestinian Arab state. Gone is the voice of Rabbi Wolf, supported by Rabbi Hertzberg, who warned of the moral consequences what it means to receiving funding from a foreign governments… which would coopt a genuine grass roots Jewish initiative. The episode described above speaks wonders for the intrinsic integrity of Rabbi Arnold Jacob Wolf, who would not compromise on a matter of principle. |