Jerusalem Talmud Pesachim 1:5

משנה: וְעוֹד אָמַר רִבִּי יְהוּדָה שְׁתֵּי חַלּוֹת שֶׁל תּוֹדָה פְּסוּלוֹת וּמוּנָּחוֹת עַל גַּג הָאִיצְטֳבָא. כָּל־זְמַן שֶׁהֶן מוּנָּחוֹת כָּל־הָעָם אוֹכְלִין. נִיטְלָה אַחַת תּוֹלִין לֹא אוֹכְלִין וְלֹא שׂוֹרְפִין. נִיטְלוּ שְׁתֵּיהֶן הִתְחִילוּ כָּל־הָעָם שׂוֹרְפִין. רַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל אוֹמֵר חוּלִין נֶאֱכָלִין כָּל־אַרְבַּע וּתְרוּמָה כָּל־חָמֵשׁ וְשׂוֹרְפִין בִּתְחִילַּת שֵׁשׁ׃ MISHNAH: In addition, Rebbi Jehudah said, two disqualified loaves of thanksgiving offering¹⁴³At Jerusalem in Temple times, the Temple was the timekeeper and signalled to the people the times to dispose of leavened matter. A thanksgiving offering requires the addition of leavened bread Leviticus.7.13">(Lev. 7:13). Since the bread was kept until the time its consumption was forbidden, one used loaves which could not be eaten, either because they were impure or because they were from the preceding day’s offering. A thanksgiving offering must be consumed on the day it is offered Leviticus.7.15">(Lev. 7:15), this applies not only to the meat but also to the accompanying cereal. were lying on the roof of the stoa¹⁴⁴The stoa surrounding the Temple Mount. Pesachim.13b">Babli 13b. As long as they were lying there, everybody was eating. If one was removed one suspends, neither does one eat nor burn. If both were removed, everybody started to burn.
Rabban Gamliel says, profane food is eaten the entire fourth [hour] and heave the entire fifth; and one burns at the start of the sixth.

הלכה: רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן לָקִישׁ אָמַר בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי יַנַּאי. כְּשֵׁירוֹת הָיוּ. מִשֵּׁם מַאי הוּא פוֹסְלָן. שֶׁלֹּא לִשְׁחוֹט עֲלֵיהֶן אֶת הַזֶּבַח. וְלֹא בִשְׁחִיטָה הֵן קְדֵישׁוֹת. וְיִפָּדֶה וְיֵאָכֵל. אָמַר רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה. חוֹלִייָא קוֹמוֹי לֹא אָכַל. וְאַתְּ אָמַרְתָּ. יִפָּדֶה וְיֵאָכֵל. רִבִּי [חֲנִינָא] אָמַר. פְּסוּלוֹת הָיוּ. מִפְּנֵי שֶׁהֵן מְמַהֲרִין לְהָבִיא תוֹדוֹתֵיהֶן מִפּנֵי חָמֵץ שֶׁבַּתוֹדָה. וְאֵי אֶיפְשַׁר שֶׁלֹּא יִישָּׁפֵךְ דָּמָהּ שֶׁלְאֶחָד מֵהֶן וְהִיא נִפְסֶלֶת. HALAKHAH: Rebbi Simeon ben Laqish said in the name of Rebbi Yannai: They were qualified¹⁴⁵The breads exhibited as a sign. Pesachim.13b">Babli 13b.. And why does he treat them as disqualified? Not to slaughter the sacrifice for them⁶What means on the first? Does it mean on the first month, or on the first day of the holidays?. But do they not become sancta only by the slaughter? They should be redeemed and be eaten¹⁴⁶They were dedicated as bread accompanying a thanksgiving sacrifice; their holiness is that of a gift to the Temple, not that of a sacrifice. Once the sacrifice was slaughtered and the blood sprinkled on the altar, the bread becomes intrinsically holy and its status equals that of sacrificial meat which cannot be redeemed. This implies that any time before the slaughter, the bread can be redeemed to regain profane status and other bread dedicated in its stead. The bread cannot become disqualified if the corresponding sacrifice is not slaughtered.! Rebbi Ḥanania said, he has profane [bread] before him which he could not eat and you are saying, they should be redeemed and be eaten? Rebbi [Ḥanina]¹⁴⁷The name is missing in the ms. and the printed editions but retained in the quote of this passage by Pesachim 13b:9:1" href="/Tosafot_on_Pesachim.13b.9.1">Tosaphot (13b s.v. אלא). said, they were disqualified. Since they are in a hurry to bring their thanksgiving sacrifices because of the leavened bread with the sacrifice¹⁴⁸The Yerushalmi assumes that thanksgiving sacrifices may be offered on the 14^th. These are family sacrifices and in this case must be eaten as long as the bread may be eaten. Since no sacrifices may be offered before the daily morning sacrifice, the time to consume an entire animal is very short. The Pesachim.13b">Babli 13b holds that no thanksgiving sacrifice is accepted on the 14^th and refers R. Yannai’s statement to bread dedicated for such a sacrifice which then cannot be used for sacrificial purposes., it is impossible that not the blood of one of them be spilled¹⁴⁹An argument accepted in the Pesachim.13b">Babli 13b as minority opinion of R. Simeon ben Eleazar. and it becomes disqualified.

תַּנֵּי. שְׁתֵּי פָּרוֹת חוֹרְשׁוֹת [בִּירוּשָׁלִַם.] וִירושָׁלִַם לֹא בְמָקוֹם שֶׁנָּהֲגוּ שֶׁלֹּא לַעֲשׂוֹת מָלָאכָה בְּאַרְבָּעָה עָשָׁר הִיא. נִרָאֵית כְּחוֹרְשׁוֹת. אִית תַּנָּיֵי תַנֵּי. שְׁתֵּי נֵירוֹת דּוֹלְקִין. אִית תַּנָּיֵי תַנֵּי. שְׁנֵי סַדִּינִין. אָמַר רִבִּי פִינְחָס. וְלֹא פְלִיגִין. מָאן דְּאָמַר. שְׁתֵּי פָּרוֹת שְׁתֵּי נֵירוֹת. בַּחוֹל. מָאן דָּמַר. שְׁנֵי סַדִּינִין. בַּשַּׁבָּת. It was stated: Two cows were ploughing [in Jerusalem]¹⁵⁰Pesachim.14a">Babli 14a. In this version they were ploughing on Mount Olivet and could be seen everywhere in Jerusalem. One had to stop eating leavened bread when only one cow was seen.. But is Jerusalem not a place where they used not to work on the Fourteenth¹⁵¹The 14^th is a semi-holiday. As noted in Pesachim 4:1:1" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Pesachim.4.1.1">Mishnah 4:1, whether work in the morning was permitted or forbidden was a matter of local custom.? They were looking as if ploughing. There are Tannaim who stated: Two lights were burning. There are Tannaim who stated: Two sheets¹⁵²Two large linen sheets displayed as flags.. Rebbi Phineas said, they do not disagree. He who said, two cows, two lights, on a weekday. He who said, two sheets, on the Sabbath.

רִבִּי חֲנַנְיָה בְעָא קוֹמֵי רִבִּי מָנָא. וְיִקְבְּעוּ לָהּ תְּקִיעָה. אָמַר לֵיהּ. אִם אוֹמֵר אַתְּ כֵּן נִמְצֵאתָה [אוֹמֵר. שֶׁמָּא] לְתָמִיד הֵן תוֹקְעִין [וְהֵן מִתְקַלְקְלִין]. אָמַר לֵיהּ. וְהָא תַנִּינָן. שָׁלשׁ לְהַבְטִיל אֶת הָעָם מִן הַמְּלָאכָה. וְשָׁלשׁ לְהַבְדִּיל בֵּין קוֹדֶשׁ לְחוֹל. אָמַר לֵיהּ. תַּמָּן כָּל־עֶרֶב שַׁבָּת וְשַׁבָּת הֵן תוֹקְעִין וְאֵינָּן טוֹעִין. בְּרַם הָכָא אַחַת לְקִיצִּין הֵן. אִם אוֹמֵר אַתְּ כֵּן. אַף הֵן סְבוּרִין שֶׁמָּא לְתָמִיד הֵן תוֹקְעִין וְהֵן מִתְקַלְקְלִין. Rebbi Ḥananiah asked before Rebbi Mana, should they not insitute trumpet blowing? If you say so, it would turn out that [they would say, maybe] they blow for the daily sacrifice¹⁵³As required by Numbers.10.10">Num. 10:10.[, and they would be led astray]. He retorted, but did we not state: “Three to separate people from work, and three to separate between weekday and holiness”¹⁵⁴Sukkah 5:5:1" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Sukkah.5.5.1">Mishnah Sukkah 5:5. Every Friday afternoon after the daily sacrifice trumpets were blown to announce the coming of the Sabbath.? He answered him, there every single Friday they are blowing, one will not err. But here it is once in a long time; if you say so, it would turn out that they would say, maybe they blow for the daily sacrifice, and they would be led astray.

לָמַּה. מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אוֹ מִשׁוּם שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. מַה נְפִיק מִבֵּינֵיהוֹן. חַלּוֹת תּוֹדָה. אִין תֵּימַר שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. אֵילּוּ אוֹכְלֶיהֶן מְצוּיִין. אִין תֵּימַר מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אֵילּוּ יֵשׁ לָהֶן קְדוּשָּׁה. רִבִּי נָתָן אוֹמֵר. כְּשֵׁירוֹת נִיטְלוּ (שֶׁיְּהוּ) [שׁוֹהִין] לָהֶן שָׁעָה אַחַת לַאֲכִילָתָן וְתוֹלִין אֲבָל לֹא שׂוֹרְפִין. אִית לָךְ מֵימַר מִשׁוּם שֶׁאֵין אוֹכְלֶיהָ מְצוּיִין. לֹא מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. אוֹף הָכָא מִפְּנֵי קְדושָּׁתָהּ. Why¹⁵⁵Why may heave, which is a sanctum and may be eaten only by pure Cohanim, be eaten an additional hour?? Because of its holiness or because its eaters are few? What is the difference between them? The breads of the thanksgiving sacrifice. If you are saying because its eaters are few, the eaters of these are many¹⁵⁶Of the 10 breads accompanying a thanksgiving sacrifice, 9 are eaten by the offerer and his family, only one by a Cohen.. If you are saying because of its holiness, these are holy. Rebbi Nathan says, they¹⁵⁷He agrees with R. Jehudah that two breads were displayed as a sign that leavened matter may be eaten. He disagrees with him on two points. First, that the breads were pure sancta, and that they were lifted together and eaten, exactly one hour before leavening had to be burned. were taken when qualified, (that there be) [one waits]¹⁵⁸The scribe’s text (in parentheses) is as good as the corrector’s [in brackets]/ one hour when they can be eaten, one suspends but does not burn. Could you say because its eaters are few¹⁵⁹Since they are only two, they could be eaten by the person lifting them.? No, because of its holiness; here also because of its holiness.

אָמַר רִבִּי יוּדָה בֵּן פָּזִי. נִרָאִין דְּבָרִים שֶׁתְּהֵא הֲלָכָה כְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. שֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר מֵעֵין שְׁנֵיהֶן. אֲתֲאַ רִבִּי אָבוּן רִבִּי יוֹחָנָן בְּשֵׁם רִבִּי שִׁמְעוֹן בֶּן יוֹצָדָק. הֲלָכָה כְרַבָּן גַּמְלִיאֵל. שֶׁהוּא אוֹמֵר מֵעֵין שְׁנֵיהֶן. Rebbi Jehudah ben Pazi said, it seems that practice has to follow Rabban Gamliel since he says it similar to both of them¹⁶⁰R. Meïr and R. Jehudah in Pesachim 1:4:1" href="/Jerusalem_Talmud_Pesachim.1.4.1">Mishnah 4. There came Rebbi Abun, Rebbi Joḥanan in the name of Rebbi Simeon ben Josadaq: practice follows Rabban Gamliel since what he says is similar to both of them.